When it comes to processors, comparing two from different generations can be an intriguing task, especially when looking at a modern chip like the Intel Alder Lake N100 versus an older but once high-performing processor like the Intel Core i5-3570 (clocked at 3.4 GHz). These two CPUs belong to very different families and eras of Intel’s processor lineup, with significant differences in architecture, core design, and performance.
In this article, we will compare the Alder Lake N100 to the Intel Core i5-3570 across multiple factors, including clock speed, core architecture, performance benchmarks, and overall usability for common tasks. By the end of this analysis, you’ll have a clear understanding of how these processors stack up against each other and where they excel in specific applications.
Overview of the Alder Lake N100 and Intel Core i5-3570
Before diving into the technical comparison, it’s important to briefly review the two processors and their intended use cases.
Alder Lake N100: Modern Efficiency
The Alder Lake N100 is part of Intel’s 12th generation Alder Lake family, a line that features both performance (P) cores and efficiency (E) cores. The N100, however, is a low-power chip specifically targeted for budget laptops, mini-PCs, and other low-energy devices. It is built with a focus on energy efficiency rather than raw performance.
Key Specs:
- Cores: 4 E-cores (no P-cores)
- Base Clock Speed: 1.0 GHz
- Boost Clock Speed: Up to 3.4 GHz
- TDP (Thermal Design Power): 6W
- Architecture: 12th Gen (Alder Lake), using Intel 7 process technology
- Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics
The N100 is designed to prioritize power efficiency and multi-threaded performance for lightweight tasks, offering solid performance for basic computing tasks, multimedia playback, and light multitasking.
Intel Core i5-3570: A Former Powerhouse
The Intel Core i5-3570 was released in 2012 as part of Intel’s 3rd generation Ivy Bridge lineup. It was one of the top-performing processors of its time, widely used in mid-range desktops for both gaming and productivity. Despite being several generations old, the i5-3570 still holds its own in some tasks, but it lacks modern features like high energy efficiency, multi-core performance scaling, and integrated AI technologies.
Key Specs:
- Cores/Threads: 4 cores, 4 threads (no hyper-threading)
- Base Clock Speed: 3.4 GHz
- Max Turbo Frequency: 3.8 GHz
- TDP: 77W
- Architecture: Ivy Bridge, 22nm process technology
- Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 2500/4000
The i5-3570 was known for its strong single-core performance, making it a popular choice for gaming and productivity tasks during its prime.
Core Architecture Comparison
The architectural differences between the Alder Lake N100 and the i5-3570 are significant. The Alder Lake N100 uses a modern big.LITTLE architecture with efficiency-focused E-cores, while the i5-3570 relies on older, more power-hungry cores designed for raw processing power.
Alder Lake N100
The N100’s 12th generation Alder Lake architecture includes four efficiency (E) cores, which are designed to handle basic tasks while consuming minimal power. These cores are ideal for multitasking and lightweight applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and media playback.
- Power efficiency is the primary strength of the N100, with its 6W TDP being far lower than the 77W of the i5-3570.
- The E-cores in the Alder Lake series prioritize background tasks and general computing while consuming minimal energy.
Intel Core i5-3570
The i5-3570 features four standard cores with no efficiency distinction. These cores are designed for high single-threaded performance, making the chip ideal for heavy-duty tasks during its era, such as gaming, video editing, and 3D rendering. However, the architecture does not support the level of multitasking efficiency seen in modern processors.
- The Ivy Bridge architecture focuses on maximizing performance per clock cycle, but it lacks the efficiency found in modern chips like the Alder Lake N100.
- With no hyper-threading, the i5-3570 handles only four threads, which limits its ability to manage multi-threaded workloads in today’s highly parallel computing environment.
Clock Speed and Power Consumption
At first glance, it’s easy to assume that the 3.4 GHz base clock speed of the i5-3570 gives it a performance edge over the Alder Lake N100, which operates at a 1.0 GHz base clock and can boost up to 3.4 GHz. However, clock speed alone doesn’t determine performance, especially when comparing processors from different eras.
Alder Lake N100: Efficiency Over Raw Speed
The N100’s base clock of 1.0 GHz may seem low, but it can dynamically boost to 3.4 GHz when additional performance is needed, particularly for single-threaded tasks. The lower base clock reflects the N100’s design for low-power consumption and passive cooling solutions, often used in fanless mini-PCs and laptops.
- Power consumption is highly optimized, making the N100 ideal for portable devices that need long battery life.
- While the N100 boosts to 3.4 GHz, it operates most efficiently at lower frequencies, focusing on handling lighter tasks with minimal energy usage.
Intel Core i5-3570: Raw Performance
The i5-3570 has a base clock of 3.4 GHz and can boost to 3.8 GHz for short bursts, giving it strong single-core performance. However, the 77W TDP is considerably higher than the N100, meaning the i5-3570 consumes far more power and generates more heat. This high power consumption makes the i5-3570 more suited to desktop applications rather than portable or battery-powered devices.
- Raw performance is higher, especially in single-threaded workloads.
- The i5-3570 is power-hungry compared to modern processors, making it less efficient for daily multitasking or prolonged use in low-power devices.
Performance Benchmarks: Alder Lake N100 vs i5-3570
To better understand the real-world performance differences between the Alder Lake N100 and the Intel Core i5-3570, we’ll examine benchmark comparisons based on different types of workloads, including gaming, productivity, and multitasking.
Single-Core Performance
The i5-3570 wins in single-core performance due to its higher base and turbo frequencies. It was designed for tasks that depend heavily on single-threaded workloads, such as older games, basic productivity apps, and specific content creation tasks. However, with modern software increasingly optimized for multi-threading, this gap is less significant in today’s applications.
Multi-Core Performance
In multi-core performance, the Alder Lake N100 has the edge due to its four efficiency cores designed for multitasking. While these cores don’t match the raw power of the i5-3570’s cores, the N100 can handle multiple lightweight tasks simultaneously with far greater efficiency. This makes it a better choice for modern workloads like running multiple applications, web browsing, and video playback.
Gaming and Graphics Performance
While neither of these chips is a powerhouse for modern gaming, the i5-3570 still offers better performance in older games that rely on CPU speed. However, for casual gaming and multimedia tasks, the Alder Lake N100’s Intel UHD integrated graphics are far more efficient and better optimized for newer software.
- i5-3570 with discrete graphics cards still outperforms the N100 in gaming, but for integrated solutions, the Alder Lake N100 is more capable for lighter workloads.
Conclusion: Which Processor is Better?
Choosing between the Alder Lake N100 and the Intel Core i5-3570 depends entirely on your use case:
- For power efficiency, multitasking, and modern applications, the Alder Lake N100 is the clear winner. It is designed for low-energy devices, offers longer battery life, and handles most day-to-day tasks with ease.
- For raw single-core performance or older applications that rely heavily on clock speed, the i5-3570 still holds up, but its power consumption makes it less suitable for portable or energy-efficient environments.
Ultimately, if you’re building or upgrading a system for basic use, the Alder Lake N100 offers better value and efficiency for the modern computing landscape. However, if you’re working with legacy systems or specific tasks that require high single-threaded performance, the i5-3570 remains a viable option for certain use cases.
Post Comment